VP Ryan? Prof. Ryan? GOP nominee's future unclear
Photo
JANESVILLE--Professor Ryan? Lobbyist Ryan? Maybe back to plain-old Rep. Ryan or future President Ryan?
If Paul Ryan loses his bid to become vice president, he is still a man with options. The wonky chairman of the House Budget Committee is one of the Republicans' best voices in explaining fiscal issues. Should Mitt Romney's presidential bid fail, Ryan will be a much-sought-after figure in political and business circles.
Even in failure, the 42-year-old Wisconsin native's best days might be ahead of him.
"I refer to Paul Ryan as the Paul Revere of the next generation," said Ohio Gov. John Kasich, who was chairman of the House Budget Committee when Ryan was an aide there.
"I tell you, he's just getting started," Kasich said at a recent rally in Ohio. "He's getting started in the process of helping America and building a much stronger America."
That could be through public education or lobbying, back in his day job as a congressman or biding his time until a presidential run of his own. Unlike his Democratic counterpart, 69-year-old Joe Biden, Ryan is nowhere near retirement; a Biden loss would probably send him home to Delaware, although Biden joked this week about running for president in 2016.
Publicly, Ryan and his closest allies maintain that momentum is behind the Romney-Ryan ticket. They aren't entertaining any talk about anything different from Ryan settling into the vice president's residence in January. Ryan already has met once with Mike Leavitt, the former health and human services secretary who is building a government-in-waiting for Romney, Ryan advisers said.
But Ryan's biggest boosters realize he probably can write his own ticket, win or lose on Nov. 6.
These Ryan allies spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private proposals they were preparing for him. They insist Ryan is not worried about anything beyond the election and is not planning anything except being a governing partner to Romney.
They say that if he fails, Ryan's instincts will be to return to the House — he is running for re-election to his House seat at the same time he's Romney's running mate — and resume his role as Budget Committee chairman.
Some senior Republicans caution it might not be that easy.
If Romney loses, Ryan will be seen as a leading White House contender in 2016. He will be a national party figure even without being a top member of the House leadership. That could breed resentment among current Republican leaders and perhaps splinter coalitions within the already fractured GOP alliances at the top of the House.
A return also would make Ryan a leading target for Democrats. For the next few years, Democrats would lay traps in legislation, forcing him to take sides on measures that could come back to haunt him during a presidential bid.
That is why some of Ryan's biggest boosters are considering whether it wouldn't be better for Ryan to resign from the House. He could write a book — "saving America" is a theme often bandied about — or teach at a university.
After all, on the campaign trail, Ryan is as much lecturer as campaigner. Aides routinely set up giant video screens so Ryan can use visual aids to walk audiences through the minutiae of budget politics. Graphs and charts are as common as yard signs and American flags at some events, with Ryan settling into his role as explainer in chief.
It's no accident he embraces the "wonk" label aggressively. It could make him an attractive figure as a guest lecturer or visiting professor.
Or Ryan could set up an office at a Washington think tank and focus on issues that interest him. That would give him a platform to shape public policy without the frustrations of electoral politics.
Both options would give Ryan some space to contemplate serious issues. One of the chief reasons Romney put him on the ticket — and one of the reasons he accepted — was to have high-minded debates about Washington's relationship with the public. That notion quickly melted into the partisan rancor of this campaign.
Ryan could cash in and become a lobbyist. His family is on solid financial footing, thanks in part to wife Janna Ryan's family money. Last year, the couple reported adjusted gross income of more than $323,000. Yet Ryan himself has never been a major earner. He started out as a congressional aide and waited tables to pay the bills.
Ryan might just take up positions in corporate boardrooms, either as a consultant or director. The lucrative positions, though, could preclude a future White House run if not carefully chosen.
During the Republican presidential primary campaign, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich faced questions about his profitable network of consulting and media firms. One of his clients was mortgage giant Freddie Mac, which he blamed for the economic crisis of 2008.
If he wins re-election, Ryan could simply settle back into life in Congress.
Republican John McCain returned to the Senate after his failed 2000 and 2008 presidential bids. Democrat John Kerry did the same after his 2004 bid and Joe Lieberman, now an independent, after his 2000 vice presidential failure on the Democratic ticket. McCain's running mate, Sarah Palin, returned to be governor of Alaska, until she abruptly resigned seven months later and turned to punditry.
Ryan has shown little interest in following Palin — or other ex-candidates — into media circles. He is more likely to protect his newfound popularity, his credibility and his brand.
If Romney loses, it would guarantee a wide-open field for Republicans and Democrats alike in 2016. Ryan's allies aren't ruling out a bid for the top spot for their friend.
Nov 4, 2012 at 9:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
I sure hope voters take your advice to educate themselves before voting, timetowakeup since that would guarantee an Obama victory.
Nov 4, 2012 at 9:12 a.m.
Suggest removal
“The reason I got involved in public service, by and large, if I had to credit one thinker, one person, it would be Ayn Rand," said Ryan.
In remarks he made before a meeting of the Atlas Society in 2005, a group dedicated to her philosophy, Ryan said, “I grew up reading Ayn Rand and it taught me quite a bit about who I am and what my value systems are, and what my beliefs are. It's inspired me so much that it's required reading in my office for all my interns and my staff.”
Paul Ryan only claimed he disagreed with Ayn Rand when he found out she was an atheist and he knew supporting an atheist be a political disadvantage to him.
His current budgets and policies are right in tune with his beliefs and Ayn Rand philosophies: Government safety nets and Charity are IMMORAL!
By all means, do educate yourselves, don't allow one person who would use the "kool-aid" cliche to prevent you from finding out who Paul Ryan and what makes him tick.
BTW, Paul Ryan does want his mother to continue on MediCare; that is why his has made sure his MediCare Voucher program would not effect those who are currently over 55. This is typical of Paul Ryan!
Nov 4, 2012 at 7:18 a.m.
Suggest removal
Sounds like someone wants you to drink more Kool-aid! Search for spin made on Ryan's early comments about Ayn Rand. Yes he read her books and has publically come out and said she goes way too far. He believes in the social security net (even notes him Mom still relies on these programs today) and yet improve025 still wants to spread lies to the contrary like those in the Democratic party. Educate yourself folks and don't rely on anyone's comments.
Nov 3, 2012 at 1:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
A simple Google search will show anyone that Paul Ryan's policies seek to cut ALL social services including MediCare by 50%. He is not trying to save any social programs. He wants to end all sociial programs. He has publically stated the philosophy of his mentor Ayn Rand: Charity is immoral. His own Catholic leaders have called him out. All this information is easily proven by reputable news sources with a simple internet search. Paul Ryan has benefited from government safety nets but he does not believe anyone else should.
Paul Ryan does not deserve to enjoy the salary that tax payers pay for.
Nov 3, 2012 at 12:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
I'm glad Ryan is our representative and that he cares so much about our social programs that he is trying to get the work done that is needed to make sure they are around for all Americans, not just those using them today. You can continue to drink the Democratic Kool-Aid that wants you to believe these programs would be wiped out by Ryan's actions and everyone would be left to fend for themselves or you can look at the facts and see what they are actually trying to do. Better yet, look to our neighbors to the South and see where the Democratic position of "promise everyone everything and spend without fiscal responsibility" will lead us (how is Illinois doing economically)? As a Catholic I also believe Ryan is much more in line with his Church's moral doctrines than Joe Biden. Thanks for your service Congressman Ryan and please keep-up the good work regardless of what happens next week.
Nov 3, 2012 at 11:04 a.m.
Suggest removal
Paul Ryan depended on Social Security as a child because of his father's death; yet, he now claims government help to others is immoral. IMMORAL!!
60 leaders of his own Catholic faith issues a public letter chastising Ryan for his policies by stating they are too harsh on the elderly, children and the disabled.
Paul Ryan and his children now live quite well on tax payer funds. He owes his own success in part for Social Security funds. Why doesn't he want others to benefit from the same safety net?
Social responsibility IS NOT socialism.
Time to vote Ryan out of government so he has more time to spend at church!
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: Walworthcountytoday.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreementcall 1-262-728-3424, extension 108
Post Comment
Commenting requires registration.